Lord El-Melloi II [AU] (
fionnuisce) wrote in
animus_network2013-11-14 12:15 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
☿ // 006; [anonymous text]
A few questions for you.
If someone's existence or action is so reprehensible as to require a form of vengeance, is it then 'right' to act against them? Does one evil act justify another?
Furthermore, does any act justify murder in the name of what's 'right'? (Assume our example is in a place where death actually has normal consequences.)
If someone's existence or action is so reprehensible as to require a form of vengeance, is it then 'right' to act against them? Does one evil act justify another?
Furthermore, does any act justify murder in the name of what's 'right'? (Assume our example is in a place where death actually has normal consequences.)
[permanon text until they're stupid]
[AnonText-It shouldn't take long.]
no subject
no subject
Sometimes things grow beyond vengeance even if that was where they originally began.
no subject
I doubt every individual in such a position could shoulder the burden of taking an evil action in the name of justice at the same time as getting blood on their hands.
no subject
And the people would still be saved. Not everyone gets to be a hero. Nor wishes to be.
no subject
Equivalent exchange at its finest. I shouldn't be surprised.
no subject
And, furthermore, you shouldn't be surprised if you find out that the one taking those actions is well aware of their wrongness and, perhaps, is even waiting for the wrong he is committing to be righted because he knows it will be someday. And his pain still won't matter because those people will be safe.
no subject
Even setting aside the implications of taking justice into one's own hands, even death is just a temporary solution.
no subject
[Whoa...down boy.]
What is death is not the real goal here? What is that is only a by product and the real goal is to teach that person that their actions will not go unchallenged from here on out? That people will fight them, even if they won't always win?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
...
If it keeps others safe? Then yes, I would become a monster to do it. I have already fallen quite a way. Better me than someone else.
no subject
How do you handle it? Knowing others have died at your hands so you and those you care about could survive, I mean.
no subject
If you really don't think you can do it, for the sake of the one you want to protect, don't. Find some other way. I am sure it would kill him more more quickly than anything else to know you fell into darkness because of him.
For me...I focus on the good that will come from the act. Those who will be saved. Those who will be protected. Those who won't have to suffer the lose of someone close to them again. Even if the path to accomplishing those things is long, it is worth it if that goal can eventually be fulfilled.
no subject
I think I fell a long time ago, in some measure.
So one more 'evil' act for the sake of others probably wouldn't matter much for me at this point, if I think about it. If it would really be a step in the right direction, then logically the choice is an obvious one.
no subject
If you are sure...then falling together would not be so bad, would it? At least then, neither of you would be alone.
no subject
no subject
no subject
But if it's the wrong fucking choice, I'll tell him it's the wrong fucking choice.
no subject
[locked; still anon because idiots]
[locked; like he's going to think to turn it off?]
Do you really think I would ever leave your side even in the darkest of dark places? No matter if I am better or more caring than you? Someone must be your light in those places...
Rise or fall, we go together. Please, just forgive me for being the one to fall this time.
[locked; dumbasses]
[locked; There is a special rank of 'dumbass' just for them.]
[locked; quite so]
Re: [locked; anon]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)