☿ // 006; [anonymous text]

[fionnuisce]

A few questions for you.

If someone's existence or action is so reprehensible as to require a form of vengeance, is it then 'right' to act against them? Does one evil act justify another?

Furthermore, does any act justify murder in the name of what's 'right'? (Assume our example is in a place where death actually has normal consequences.)

Comments

[i'm out of amusing subject lines already]

[fionnuisce]

So essentially, 'get it over with and hope you can deal with the consequences'.

[still anon. I can go all night]

[seventhsong]

If this assumed individual has already acted thus before, then it seems reasonable that they managed the consequences fairly well and will do so again.

If this is not a hypothetical question at all, then I suspect the decision is already made, and reassurance that it's the right decision is all that remains.

[does that mean the grand fonic hymn is just a translated 'get lucky']

[fionnuisce]

Nothing's been decided. Even if it was, reassurance isn't the kind of thing I'd look for from half the Tower.

[the fonic hymn is Yulia's, notice how short it is compared to the Score]

[seventhsong]

There seem to be a lot of retributionary sorts lurking about. If one wishes motivation towards bloodshed it seems half the Tower is very suited after all.

I wish I could be of more assistance, but in the end you are your own judge. Your own good and your own evil.

[shhhhh details]

[fionnuisce]

It's always living with oneself that's the real pain after things like this, I imagine.

[the devil's in the details!]

[seventhsong]

That's why it's good to ask, "Is it worth it?" I hope you find the answer you're looking for.

[then someone should get him out of there it might be uncomfortable]

[fionnuisce]

Pretty sure I'm screwed no matter what, but I appreciate the concern.