animus_network | [Anon texter]

perhaps that is something that i will agree with
it is not easy to rip the fabric of reality in so many different places

then that will just make it easier for me

Yet they have managed to do that somehow.

Does it? I would imagine it makes it harder. Either way you are overreacting to the situation and should think better about what you say and intend to do.

that they have
very disturbing

y should i

And concerning.

Because it singles you out, it brings antagonistic results and ultimately will not serve you so well. If this is as dangerous a place as people have implied, than making enemies from the go is not a wise choice. One should hold their cards closer to themselves.

perhaps depending on just what their end game is
i have a few ideas in that aspect

u r surrounded by enemies either way
even allies should not be trusted or brought that close

I did not say bring your allies closer to you, I said to keep your cards closer, meaning to not give yourself away so quickly. There is one thing to mistrust others, but another thing to gain their trust. You can mistrust while getting them to trust you. If these concepts are so important to you, than you should be trying to gain as much as possible. In this you are failing.

But it doesn't really concern me, personally I don't like liars and wouldn't encourage it, even if it meant for a more positive outcome than an alternate path.

What are your ideas of their end game?

ur not listening/reading allies do not exist
nor should u ever show others ur pieces

info, even if they're theories cost something im not going to readily hand u something like u did
facebook page

Yet you're showing me you have a short tempter and are prone to threats.

What is your price then?

cause u annoy me
if i was really angry i would have rage quit and carried out those "threats" as u like to call em

...a future favor i suppose
nothing big for something so small

As if that was a valid reason. Also, if you had carried out with those threats you would have ended up very sorry for it.

Then I will give you a future small favor, up to my discretion.

that would be my line

good ill find u when i think of something

as for the theories it could be an attempt at merging serperate worlds together into one mega universe is the first one that i have thought of

As you keep saying....

That is an interesting theory, but that seems like it would be a very messy project and only lead to ruin.

exactly therefore whoever is top dog would need to have an extremely good reason for doing so

Perhaps, but there is no good reason for doing something like that. For one it would disturb the lines between the world of the living and the world of the dead, as well the lines that keep branching timelines in order. It would be better to simply allow things to reach their natural conclusion than push everything together.

there arent any lines between worlds

separate universes are much more like bubbles...but i digress universes pop merge and are created all the time something like this would not be all that damning

wat strikes my attention is that if the theory is true they must be masters of controlling it all

Perhaps for you, but from my experience there is a line between the living world, and what is outside the living world. The back of house so to speak. If there was no line everything would happen in the same place, and that simply doesn't happen.

I wouldn't go so far as to call them masters, if this was their goal. Skilled in a way perhaps, but the execution from what I can tell is too clumsy to be any sort of master.

if thats wat u want to believe

mastery does not always = perfection

however that is just 1 goal they may have the other is that this may simple be an experiment

I believe I should understand the differences between the world of the living and the world of the dead as well as that which functions outside both better than you do.

Experiment might prove more likely.

[She would let the master and perfection argument go, it was worth pursuing.]

there r worlds within worlds wat might seem like a line to u is a bubble to another

indeed the problem is wat r they experimenting n y

That is semantics, bubble, line, it's simply saying there is a distinction. There are certain things that never mix and should never mix other than on a rare occasion. Combining different worlds together can work, but you can't combine everything into the same space. After lives can be combined with afterlives, living worlds can be combined with living worlds. To jumble it together would cause great instability and collapse.

That is the major question, I would try and theorize but my information is lacking.

worlds collide all the time this is no different
each world can have its own set of rules boundaries n universes the world of the living and dead are two that may exist within the same bubble
basic physics n computer science...only its not really all that basic

there r multiple things that they could be looking for
the problem is defining wat they r

how good would u say ur info gathering is

And still exist separately from one another. That is the main point I am making.

The problem as well as the most important question.

I am a Yama, knowing everything about a person is my job.

teh universe is big and gets bigger with every new addition it can also shrink and divide

then u will do fine at finding things out about individuals just ask the right questions

nothing to generic but also not to out there

That is true of what encompass the world of the living. However, the other world works a little differently. It's laws and physics are not the same, and will change depending on what is needed or required.

Usually I don't need to even ask questions, it's rather simple to learn of a person without ever speaking to them. Though, it's a bit invasive.

the worlds of the living and dead exist within each other its an inception within an inception

asking is better than just guessing

[Anon texter]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]

[text]

[anon text]