anon text;

[carabina]

A question, tower residents.

If a person does not have a soul, would you still consider them a person? Are they different from people who do have souls? What makes them different from others?

( ooc: Mami will reply as anon, of course. )

Comments

[carabina]

It's kind of hard to explain.
It's the spiritual part of a being, and their emotional and moral nature.

[fuhgeddaboudit]

Kind of like their heart? Can someone think and feel things for themselves without a soul?

[carabina]

I think so.
I mean, I know my friends do.

[fuhgeddaboudit]

I am a little confused--if someone's 'soul' is the same thing I was taught their 'heart' is, then without it they shouldn't be able to feel anything.

I think I can try to answer your question, though. I think that what makes a person a person is their ability to feel emotion and think for themselves. So whatever a 'soul' is, I am reasonably sure that someone can still be a person without it as long as they can still do that.

[carabina]

Like I said, it's hard to explain what a soul is.

But thank you for answering. A lot of people have been answering with a similar answer to yours.