carabina: (front ✂ I remember it was so sweet)
巴 マミ ([personal profile] carabina) wrote in [community profile] animus_network2013-02-06 09:54 am

anon text;

A question, tower residents.

If a person does not have a soul, would you still consider them a person? Are they different from people who do have souls? What makes them different from others?


( ooc: Mami will reply as anon, of course. )
relinquishing: (☼ It was a chorus so sublime)

[personal profile] relinquishing 2013-02-07 03:42 am (UTC)(link)
Living. Having the chance to live a life distinct from anyone or anything else around them. Every person has that gift. That's kind of what living is about.

I don't think a soul would change that too much, do you?
relinquishing: (☽it comes with a price)

[personal profile] relinquishing 2013-02-07 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe. Maybe not. I guess it depends how important it is to you, in the end. It's definitely an interesting idea to toss around.
relinquishing: (☼ but it's left me so undone)

[personal profile] relinquishing 2013-02-08 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
Well, the idea of a soul being separated from a body isn't something a lot of people really thing about, I guess. So your question could get a lot of people thinking. I think that's important.

So, what about it is important to you, then?
relinquishing: (☼ Except everything you had)

[personal profile] relinquishing 2013-02-16 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
[...

Did he just read that right?]


That... yeah, that would definitely count as a good reason, I guess.

How in the world did something like that happen, though?