巴 マミ (
carabina) wrote in
animus_network2013-02-06 09:54 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
anon text;
A question, tower residents.
If a person does not have a soul, would you still consider them a person? Are they different from people who do have souls? What makes them different from others?
( ooc: Mami will reply as anon, of course. )
If a person does not have a soul, would you still consider them a person? Are they different from people who do have souls? What makes them different from others?
( ooc: Mami will reply as anon, of course. )
no subject
no subject
I don't think a soul would change that too much, do you?
no subject
[ That was her wish. To live longer. Even without a soul, she's managed to be a person. A lonely person, but still a person. Even if she spent some time feeling lonely, she managed to make friends and such. ]
Now that I think about it, I don't think it changes much.
Maybe I'm just thinking too deeply about this.
no subject
no subject
And interesting? To some people it might be. It was just a question I had in mind.
no subject
So, what about it is important to you, then?
no subject
My soul was separated from my body, you could say.
no subject
Did he just read that right?]
That... yeah, that would definitely count as a good reason, I guess.
How in the world did something like that happen, though?