firstofthefallen: (Default)
Louis Cypher/Louisa Ferra/Lucifer ([personal profile] firstofthefallen) wrote in [community profile] animus_network2012-08-19 05:55 pm

2nd Candelabram - Text

A question.

Let us humor our captors and say that they are telling us the truth that our worlds are destroyed. Let us then assume we have only two places we can be: we might stay here, in this Tower for however long that may last or we might attempt to break out.

The Tower, while a cage, offers a sense of security. There are constant meals and general protection from what lies outside it's walls. We are, however, at the beck and call of the people who run the Tower and their whims. Yet with them you could say it's the devil you know, and know that their torment and cruelty would be as consistent as the stability they offer.

So assume a means of leaving this is found and we might venture out, and that what is outside is in fact inhabitable. But what we venture out into is a vast unknown and the only information we do have is that creatures like the ones who invaded here - and many more of them - roam the outside world. It would be a harsh, dangerous world. But also one with possibilities that could not be explored here. With freedom not to be found between these walls.

So given the choice if the chance of going home is out of the question, what do you choose: stability or freedom?
great_king_of_evil: art @wind waker 4-panel comic ([027] (TWW))

[Text]

[personal profile] great_king_of_evil 2012-08-20 02:59 pm (UTC)(link)
What is the point of your question? It is obvious they're all going to tell you freedom. It is what they like to believe they would chose. The thought comforts them. And yet most if not all of them come from worlds where they traded their freedom for stability. They do not even realize it, but they have never experienced freedom.

Faced with an hypothesis, all of them will go with freedom of course. Faced with an actual offer, at least half of them would go with stability. And after a period of that freedom? The remaining half would beg for stability back.
great_king_of_evil: art by <user name="DarkNo" site="deviantart.com"> ([034] (TWW))

[Text]

[personal profile] great_king_of_evil 2012-08-23 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
You are surprisingly optimist. Your faith in humanity is misplaced.

Those who seek freedom have no idea what real freedom is. What you wish for is not always as you expect it to be. Absolute freedom? I can count on a hand the number of human who could bear the weight of such freedom. Give it to them, they would be lost. They're that weak.

What they call freedom is simply a lighter form of imprisonment because they cannot work on their own. It is why humans will always relinquish their freedom to higher beings.
great_king_of_evil: ++ artist unknown ([001] Great Demon King)

[Text]

[personal profile] great_king_of_evil 2012-08-24 04:10 pm (UTC)(link)
You are smart, boy. Only through my words you figured a part of what has been my existence. You figured a slice of my psyche. I command your ability to reason and think, but unfortunately you are only in possession of a tiny part of the truth. In fact, your reasoning could be applied to yourself. You desperately seek freedom, but on your own this is an impossibility for you to accomplish. So you cling on the weak hope that there are some who can do it and through their success, only then you will find your own freedom.

Alas, this is nothing but a fool's hope.

The true freedom is when nothing surrounding you can affect you, yet your action can affect your surroundings. Nothing must be external to you, everything under your control. In short, you have to become a higher being yourself, a God. Of course, this is freedom taken to its extreme.

To simply have a moderate form of freedom, you just must reject any sort of authority and take full control of your own life. This, I accomplished. But to have absolute freedom, you must have nothing less than complete control over all and be rid of anything external that could affect you. This, I was about to accomplish. I shall accomplish.

I have witnessed the evolution of humans as you claim you saw those revelations. All I saw is a pathetic specie that barely deserves to exist. The humans I have known were actually more alike viruses, who only survived thanks to the protection of those they sold their souls to. Can you imagine humans getting rid of authority under all of its form? Can you imagine humans transcending the society, the morals and values they have desperately created and clung unto since the dawn of time? Can you imagine them rejecting the Gods and claiming full control of their destiny?

If you do, nothing but disappointment awaits you at the end of the road.
great_king_of_evil: ++ artist unknown ([033] (TWW))

[Text]

[personal profile] great_king_of_evil 2012-08-31 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Your optimism could be heart-warming if only history by itself wasn't disproving each of your words. Humans could have been born, but they cast themselves into slavery. They built society, morals and laws because they couldn't live their freedom. They knelt to the Gods because they needed someone to look over them. The very freedom you believe humanity can accomplish, even if they are to reach it they'd die from it.

And then you say, freedom can only come from the rejection of what one already has? If they reject the lies and hopes they are given? Do you even realize your words? Look around you in this tower and see for yourself. Reality is nothing like the chimera you are describing to me. Certainly a few fairy tales of old feature humans such as you describe them. Reality? I have yet to see it. Anyone in this tower has to seen.

Albeit I have to say, this tower at least served us to demonstrate that no human is unique. They are, unlike what you claim, very similar to ant. Even if one man happens to become exemplar and bring purpose, this man may exist in countless exemplary beyond the dimension. Not to mention, the simple fact that the specie needs defintion and purpose makes it a moot point.

I will not discuss your claim that you gained freedom and have seen them cast down their gods. those are your claims, your life, and as long as you do not bring me the shred of a proof, I will not believe you more than I believe those in charge.

And to end this- Allow me to give you an advise, for future times you shall debate. I am sure it will come in handy then. You should focus solely on your opponent's argument, and not on your opponent's person. In politics this is something I would advise, and even encourage you to do. In such a situation, the purpose of the debate is not the truth, the purpose of the debate is to make a greater image for yourself and destroy that of your opponent.

Alas, this is not such a situation and when you send a remark on my way, instead of destroying my image of confidence, it simply displays that that truth is not on your side. You do not want your opponent to think you cannot win a debate simply out of intelligence. Furthermore, assumptions as larges as you make them, based on a few textual replies, make an even bigger fool of yourself. And this is not what you want to happen in a debate.
great_king_of_evil: ++ artist unknown ([061] (OoT))

[Text]

[personal profile] great_king_of_evil 2012-09-03 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe next time you could lend me your life-belt.

Unless I am not the one drowning, in which case I hope you'll use it well.