Ganondorf Dragmire (
great_king_of_evil) wrote in
animus_network2013-07-11 08:56 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[04] || [Anon Text] || [Hypocrisy]
I have noticed many amongst us appear concerned about Ruana's next step, namely her siphoning of the souls left on dead worlds.
I can and do understand the will to oppose Ruana, I encourage it. However, this desire I have witnessed of saving the lost souls is quite intriguing, if not misplaced. The vast majority of these souls are people we have never met and will most likely never meet. For that matter we did not even know they existed before stepping into this tower, nor did we have any thoughts for them before seeing that message.
They have had whatsoever no impact on our lives and never will they have any. Nothing binds them to us and what fate will befall them, ultimately is none of our concern. It is their own fight while we have our own fights. Hence I have only one question:
Why do you care?
I can and do understand the will to oppose Ruana, I encourage it. However, this desire I have witnessed of saving the lost souls is quite intriguing, if not misplaced. The vast majority of these souls are people we have never met and will most likely never meet. For that matter we did not even know they existed before stepping into this tower, nor did we have any thoughts for them before seeing that message.
They have had whatsoever no impact on our lives and never will they have any. Nothing binds them to us and what fate will befall them, ultimately is none of our concern. It is their own fight while we have our own fights. Hence I have only one question:
Why do you care?
text;
anon text;
text;
anon text;
text;
anon text;
text;
anon text;
text;
(no subject)
text
ever think one of us actually do know the souls involved?
anon text
I do
n'tunderstand why you may desire to save the souls you know. However, the vast majority you do not and they are the topic of my question.Re: anon text
anon text
Re: anon text
anon text
Re: anon text
anon text
[permanon text]
I care because I do know some of the souls to which you refer. I know and care about people who know and care about them in turn, and dislike the idea of seeing my friends suffer in any capacity.
As to the ones I don't know and may never meet? I feel a sense of empathy for the lost and victimized. Those who would be hurt by forces such as Ruana are those I wish to protect. Even if this new information were not a factor I would still have sought methods to restore their worlds as well as our own.
no subject
As I mentioned to one before you, I understand to an extent why you would wish to save those you have known. The topic of my question is those you have never known.
You have mentioned empathy. It is interesting. Your sense of empathy is what drives you to want save them. But how, how can you feel empathy for people you have never met, people who means nothing for you. For all you know, people who would mindlessly kill you if given the chance.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text
text
What is your reasoning behind this?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text;
anon text;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text
anon text
Re: anon text
anon text
Re: anon text
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[text]
[text]
What is cold-hearted about taking care of your own burdens and leaving others to fend for themselves?
[text]
(no subject)
(no subject)
[Text]
I know that we might not be able to save all of them, or even any of them..but it's better to worry and try to save all of them that we can, even if we don't know most of them. I wouldn't want them to be eaten.
no subject
[Text]
(no subject)
[Text]
[text]
None of those people are meant to die yet. They deserve as much of a chance at life as we have.
Maybe we don't know all of them, but a good person doesn't let that stop them from helping people in need.
[Minato died for billions of people who will never know him, after all. Ryoji wouldn't hesitate to do the same.]
no subject
(no subject)
anon;
[Anon is almost out of fucks to give.] Some of us have family and friends trapped in the dead worlds, and don't want them to suffer more than they already are. Some of us are horrified at the thought of our closest ties being used as nothing more than batteries.
no subject
What startles me is this will to protect people with no meaning to us.
[text | anon]
no subject
(no subject)
text;
There are many who have returned to their original, destroyed worlds that those who remain count as friends. Whether or not we knew them before we came here or not, it is the horrors many in these halls and floors have faced that brought them together. No matter who or what they were before being brought here, those bonds - like a very few things that remain real outside of the glamour - remain true to those who cling to them; fleeting and fragile as they can be.
It is because of these bonds, or maybe a desire to protect others - to stand up for those who can't - and the others listed above that so many care. While these and many other reasons can be selfish to some, one more thought that is even more selfish comes to mind:
If she sends us home, our own fates won't be as different as theirs.
no subject
Very well.
However, if she sent us home, I wouldn't count on anyone here to fight for our fates. You have to be able to fight for yourself. If you cannot, then you deserve to die.
(no subject)
text
If I get kicked out of this place, I don't wanna have to worry about my soul being a snack. Well, I don't expect that to happen, so that leaves the most important thing. Once she's gotten rid of all those people, she's probably gonna sink her fangs into the ones that are left in the tower. I dunno about you, but I don't want to get sucked dry here any more than I do there.
no subject
This is certainly the most sensed reasoning I have yet read.
(no subject)
anon text
But people get mad if you say that, so I don't.
no subject
text;
[ Then again, Asahi is just a bleeding heart when it comes to this stuff. ]
no subject
Furthermore if they cannot fight for themselves, then maybe they do deserve to die. Life itself is a fight that shouldn't be cast upon the shoulders of others.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[ text ]
But, that is what makes humanity beautiful to me. Humans will, time and time again, go to amazing lengths and complete feats to overcome a challenge. So, if this action makes them selfish for wanting to save the lost souls from damnation, then so be it.
...
Besides, anonymous, do you not have anyone that you would save? Even if it is for an antagonistic purpose, for example, that person is always your rival?
no subject
I have not anyone I wish to save. Not in this tower, not in my world nor anywhere else. Not any more. However even if I did, I would follow reasons before a foolish course of action.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[text]
I don't think I understand.
If you're saying that we don't have people left on our worlds--or other worlds--that we care about, then...I'm sorry, but that's incorrect. As far as I know, I'm the only one who's been saved from where I'm from, which means my best friends--my wife--are still there, and I want to save them more than anything. So I'm assuming that's not what you meant?
Otherwise, I'm guessing that you're using the "needs of the many" argument, but...again, that doesn't make a lot of sense, because if we aim to save the people we love that have been left behind, then we'll also probably save everyone else, too. It just kind of...works together, doesn't it?
I apologize if I've completely missed the point here, but I would like to help you if I can.
no subject
And no, it doesn't work together. If we are to fight Ruana, the battle may go much further than the current deadline we have. Before this fight is over, she may have siphoned the worlds already.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; so very anonymous
When it is a matter of blood, of course it matters.
no subject
[ Blood could mean many things to him in the context. ]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[Text]
no subject
Nodbody will ask you the question, your point is moot.
(no subject)
[Text] You can thank Lucifel for this tag's existence.
I will say you seem to misunderstand something: Even if you believe there is no true selflessness in the world, as it seems from your repeated attempts to lead people to say they are selfish, you seem to overlook the truth that empathy exists - the very question you posed demonstrates the distinct lack of it in yourself.
And it seems as if you are refusing to try to understand empathy; rather than trying to understand the answers you receive, you try to force them to agree with you. As long as you do this, you will never see beyond your view of the world - will never have empathy or understand it. And as long as you do not understand it, you will never truly know the answer to your question.
But you were never looking for an answer, were you?
*There probably won't be a reply.*
no subject
You are correct. I never expected an answer. I expected to lead people to realize that they are going to lose everything if they try to save everything.
(text;)
You say they have their own fight while we have ours... but that's not true. The fact is, we're here right now, we're the only ones who can make a difference. We have to speak for ourselves, and for the people back on our worlds.
We have to fight our fight, and theirs.
no subject
It is regrettable that they cannot be here, but this is how it is. If you try to save them all, you will never be able to save what is most important to you.
Are you all so blind or is this just foolishness?
[ That, is Ganondorf's nerves giving way after all these replies. ]
text.
someone told me before that letting innocent people die is a failure anyway. i kind of get it but as long as we survive thats better than nothing right?
no subject